Increase
access to healthy food
by Leo Horrigan, director
of the Urban Agriculture Project for the Center for a Livable Future
at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Published on June 16, 2002
© 2002- The Baltimore Sun
MAYOR MARTIN
O'Malley's success in attracting supermarkets to Baltimore will
improve the food security of some city residents, but this initiative
should be viewed as one component of a comprehensive food policy
for the city and region.
Baltimore does not meet the national Community Food Security Coalition's
definition of a food-secure community because not all people can
obtain a nutritionally adequate, culturally appropriate diet all
of the time. The CFSC is a nonprofit organization with more than
250 member groups. The concept of food insecurity encompasses not
just those who go hungry but those who don't know where their next
meal is coming from and those who depend on emergency food sources,
including soup kitchens and supplemental food programs such as school
lunches. The food-insecure are among the 45,000 people in the state
who are served by Maryland Food Bank programs each week.
Poverty, of course, is a key factor in food insecurity. Since 21
percent of the city's population is mired in poverty, Baltimore
City faces a particularly urgent problem.
According to the Center for Poverty Solutions, Baltimore City has
12 percent of the state's population but 43 percent of the state's
households that receive food stamps.
Nearly two-thirds of the city's public school students qualify for
free school meals. Forty-four percent of the people served by the
Maryland Food Bank have to choose between paying for food or paying
for utilities.
Many people in Baltimore do not go hungry but lack the nutrients
they need to be healthy because they have poor access to fresh foods
and nutritional education. Others survive on high-fat, high-sugar
diets that contribute to the increasing prevalence of obesity, diabetes
and heart disease in the United States.
Access to grocery stores is a key part of improving food security.
More supermarkets will help, but that's not the only answer. Other
cities, such as Chicago and Detroit, have established food policy
councils - generally as part of city government - to develop ways
to make their local food systems better serve both local farmers
and consumers.
Such a council could thoroughly study Baltimore's food system and
determine whether nutritious food is available close to where people
live. In a report released last summer titled "From Farm to
Table: Making the Connection in the Mid-Atlantic Food System,"
the Capital Area Food Bank documented the disparity in the number
of food outlets in poorer sections of Washington compared with more
affluent ones.
For example, Ward 2 - which includes Dupont Circle and downtown,
with a median income of $39,225 - had 413 sit-down restaurants and
34 retail stores selling fresh produce. Ward 8 - which includes
Anacostia and Congress Heights, with a similar population but a
median income of only $12,651 - had only seven sit-down restaurants
and seven retail stores with produce. Doubtless, we could find similar
contrasts in Baltimore.
The public transportation system must also be examined to ensure
that it provides adequate access to grocery stores. Hartford, Conn.,
made changes to its bus system because it worked well for suburban
commuters but not for city residents trying to get to supermarkets.
A cross-town bus route was added connecting poorer residents with
supermarkets they couldn't otherwise reach.
To help address food insecurity, Baltimore can improve the local
food system. The city has a head start because it has so many local
assets upon which to build: the public markets such as Lexington
Market, farmers' markets, a-rabs, a regional seafood industry based
on the Chesapeake Bay's natural abundance, the rich farmland surrounding
Baltimore, and so on.
A coordinated, comprehensive approach that enables Baltimoreans
to have greater access to healthy food would not only reduce their
reliance on soup kitchens and fast-food outlets but would improve
their quality of life and reduce health care costs in the decades
ahead.
Leo Horrigan is director of the Urban Agriculture Project for
the Center for a Livable Future at the Johns Hopkins School of Public
Health.
|